Now, ReFS should have those things – or at least one would hope they do. So it’s no surprise that something like O365 which probably uses a lot of metadata capabilities in NTFS, ACLs, etc to enforce things and track information is not compatible with FAT. Or its crazy MS doing stupid stuff because management said “only NTFS!”.įAT also doesn’t support permissions, ACLs, etc like NTFS does. There is either a really good technical answer as to why they disabled it. Even with FAT32 it took up an significant portion of disk space just to store the allocation tables thus ExFAT was introduced which was completely incompatible instead of extending it to FAT64 or FAT128 – it’s just inefficient. Wouldn’t they want to get as much usage as possible? What gives? įAT file systems have their uses, but they don’t scale well. One drive is kinda of a service that could theoretically earn microsoft money. Microsoft just killed them off for no good reason. Ignoring the fact that FAT is awesome and anyone who says elseways is an obtuse potato licker, Fat and other files systems were working.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |